Planners cheer ruling on Tahoe shores

archive_import

SACRAMENTO (AP) Land-use planners and government agencies, accustomed to second guessing themselves when saying no to developers, are hailing a new U.S. Supreme Court ruling as a victory for sound planning in California.

The ruling, defending government rights to restrict development along the Lake Tahoe shoreline, is the ''most significant case for government in 15 years,'' said Bill Higgins, senior staff attorney for the League of California Cities.

Higgins and others who regulate what can and can't be built in California said the ruling eases years of doubts about rights to temporarily ban development while studying its possible consequences.

Developers and land owners often argue that such delays amount to ''taking'' their land and sue for financial compensation.

''We refer to it as the 'chilling effect,''' said Higgins. ''Just the fact that the government prevailed on good planning principles strengthens the resolve of government to engage in these processes.''

Tuesday, the nation's highest court defended the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency halt during the 1980s of halting lakeshore development it believed was harming the lake. Hundreds of people who bought lakeshore lots expecting to build on them demanded money when the government stalled them. The court ruled that a development moratorium did not legally amount to ''taking'' their property.

Though no current California land-use cases directly mirror the Tahoe situation, planners said the court's message signals a victory for them.

''It's an affirmation of what we've been doing,'' said Ralph Faust, chief counsel of the California Coastal Commission.

''We have situations where we look at development and approve development on part of the property and restrict it on other parts,'' Faust said. ''We've always felt it was constitutional, but there's also been a lingering question. Certainly, we think it's a positive decision.''

Attorney General Bill Lockyer, in a statement, called the ruling a victory for ''sound planning practices and for the future of police power measures necessary to protect public health and safety.''

11699966
The Union Democrat
This image is copyrighted.

Reach all of Sonora, Calaveras County, Tuolumne, Angels Camp, Twain Harte, & Jamestown with your items to sell.

Ads appear Online and in Print

View Classifieds Place an Ad

Connect with The Union Democrat

Union Democrat Newsstand

Friday April 28, 2017

Read digital interactive editions of our publications

Read Today's Edition Take A Tour

More Publications by The Union Democrat

View All Publications
Beloved music teacher, actor dies at 64

04/24/2017

The local arts community is mourning the loss of Rick Restivo, a ... more

Cannabis and Calaveras County

04/21/2017

Marijuana farms are tucked away on isolated mountainsides in Calaveras County, out ... more

Several new businesses to open in downtown Sonora

01/26/2017

It’s shaping up to be a transformative year for the City of ... more

Former Stanislaus National Forest employee missing

04/26/2017

The Tuolumne County Sheriff’s Office Search and Rescue team is continuing its ... more

Barrett pleads guilty to one count of manslaughter

04/24/2017

Jeremiah Barrett pleaded guilty Monday to one count of voluntary manslaughter and ... more