Public input on Framework sought

archive_import

By GENEVIEVE BOOKWALTER

The U.S. Forest Service wants public comment on how the Stanislaus and other national forests spanning the Sierra Nevada range should be managed.

That's why, in two sessions next week, Forest Service representatives will tell people exactly how to write their comments and where to send them.

Tables also will be set up where those interested can write their comments, which will be collected and forwarded to officials working on the Sierra Nevada Framework project.

The two meetings are not public hearings where critics can air their concerns. Instead, said Stanislaus National Forest spokesman Jerry Snyder, they are informational sessions on revisions to the Framework and lessons on how to properly comment on those proposed changes.

Question-and-answer sessions will be part of each program.

The Framework was adopted in January 2001, during the last days of the Clinton administration. A management plan for 11 national forests across the mountain range, it put a premium on environmental conservation and reduced logging and grazing. The Forest Service spent 10 years and about $20 million developing the plan.

Eleven months after its release, the Bush administration directed Regional Forester Jack Blackwell to review the document. He chartered a forest service team to evaluate the Framework, looking for ways to pursue more aggressive fire fuels treatments while reducing its harmful effects on grazing permit holders and on local communities.

Recommendations were given to Blackwell in March. The team advised that more trees be cut in the name of fire protection. Less fuel in the forest, members reasoned, could help stop forest fires from growing into infernos. Team members also recommended transferring grazing authority to local foresters, who could manage meadows with methods specific to each.

The Forest Service announced the changes in March, spurring applause from loggers and outcry from environmentalists.

Now the agency has released its supplemental environmental impact statement for the proposals and is waiting for the public to respond on whether to implement some or all of them.

11508397
The Union Democrat
This image is copyrighted.

Reach all of Sonora, Calaveras County, Tuolumne, Angels Camp, Twain Harte, & Jamestown with your items to sell.

Ads appear Online and in Print

View Classifieds Place an Ad

Connect with The Union Democrat

Union Democrat Newsstand

Saturday February 25, 2017

Read digital interactive editions of our publications

Read Today's Edition Take A Tour

More Publications by The Union Democrat

View All Publications
McClintock supporters, protesters call for peaceful event

02/20/2017

With people speculating about what could become the largest protest Sonora has ... more

McClintock town hall draws large, divided crowd

02/22/2017

There was patriotic singing, chanting and sign waving inside the packed 569-seat ... more

Diverse views outside McClintock Town Hall

02/22/2017

They came with signs and flags and at least one mask, expressing ... more

County appoints working group on marijuana regulations

02/22/2017

What do two county supervisors, a former California Highway Patrol commander, a ... more

Impounded water rushes into the Tuolumne River

02/20/2017

Worried about rising waters in the Golden State’s sixth-largest water storage facility, ... more