|
 Sonora High students walk in front of a row of school buses taking students home after school on Tuesday. Amy Alonzo Rozak/Union Democrat, copyright 2012 School districts in Tuolumne and Calaveras counties are facing the grim prospect of shouldering the entire cost of busing students if a provision in Gov. Jerry Brown’s next state budget passes without revision.
School busing services will not get state funding next year if the proposal passes, causing concern among rural schools that they will have to pay for transportation with already diminishing school district funds.
A bill that would distribute the cost of school busing across all
California school districts, including urban ones that no longer
provide busing service, is making its way through the state Legislature
this week. If it doesn’t pass, local officials say it could force them
to cut school programs and consolidate bus routes during the 2012-2013
school year.
Thanks to recent budget cuts, school districts will pay a
substantial portion for this school year. Many are relying on student
fees to help offset the cost.
For the school districts in Tuolumne and Calaveras counties, it’s a
choice between paying from the general fund or having fewer students in
school. That, in turn, would lead to a reduction in state revenue
received on the basis of average daily student attendance.
“Unlike an urban school district, we have to transport our students
in order for them to attend school,” said Calaveras High School
Principal Ric Stitt. “It’s not a choice. We’re a far-flung district.”
If the school district didn’t bus students to Calaveras High, said
Stitt, a significant number of students would have trouble getting
there. About 80 percent of the district’s students rely on buses,
according to Mike Merrill, assistant superintendent of business
services for Calaveras Unified School District.
The situation is similar in Tuolumne County, with many students traveling long distances to and from school.
“We have buses that travel many miles to pick up one or two
students,” said Joe Silva, the Tuolumne County Superintendent of
Schools. “We have to pay for those miles.”
School districts in both Tuolumne and Calaveras counties are
considering hub systems for bus routes, with parents dropping their
students off at designated stops on busier roads so that buses no
longer have to drive side streets.
According to Silva, eliminating state funds for school transportation would still affect rural schools disproportionately.
“In a sense, it’s discrimination,” said Silva. “We’re hopeful that the governor will reexamine how this money is taken.”
Calaveras Unified School District would lose about $1.34 million in
state funding for school buses in 2012-2013 if legislators don’t pass
SB 81, Merrill said. The measure would distribute cuts in funding for
school transportation across all districts in the state. It passed by a
vote of 19-4 in the Assembly Budget Committee on Tuesday and will be up
for a vote in the Assembly on Thursday.
The district is already dealing with a total budget shortfall of
$1.5 million for the 2011-2012 school year. If the proposed
transportation cuts compound planned reductions in per-pupil funding,
that shortfall would grow to an estimated $2.5 million for the
2012-2013 school year.
Sonora Union High School District would lose about $450,000
allocated for busing, but according to Chief Business Official Kim
Burr, midyear budget cuts meant that the school district got only
$181,962 of state entitlement funds for the 2011-2012 school year.
Sonora Union High School District also administers the busing of
special-education students for Tuolumne County, with the costs shared
among all the county school districts. On paper, the district was
entitled to $300,135 in state funding for transportation of special
needs students this year.
After the midyear cuts that passed in November, the state ended up
providing only $120,201 for transporting special needs students in
2011-2012, leaving the school districts to come up with the rest
themselves. By federal law, districts cannot charge special needs
students for transportation to and from school.
Students who ride Calaveras Unified School District buses this year
paid a $180 fee, about a dollar a day, to help offset the cost of
busing under California’s recent budget cuts.
It was the first time that the district has ever charged a transportation fee, Merrill said.
Students who qualify for reduced-price school lunches pay $90 per
school year, and those getting free lunches pay nothing to ride the
buses. Special needs students also get free transportation.
Altogether, 71 percent of Calaveras Unified School District
students qualify for free- or reduced-price lunches and therefore do
not pay full bus fees, according to Merrill.
The district has 18 regular bus routes and five special education
bus routes, with an additional three vans for individual special-needs
students.
Sonora High School and Summerville High School also started
charging the general student population for bus services this year.
Students at both high schools pay $120 a year to ride the bus to and
from school. Students who qualify for reduced lunches pay $60, and
those who qualify for free lunches pay nothing.
Burr said the fees don’t even begin to cover the actual cost of
busing, leaving the school district with a massive budget deficit.
Sonora School District has an average 524 students riding the bus
to school daily this year, according to Superintendent Leigh Shampain.
It received $172,445 in transportation funding from the state. The
district added $42,000 from its general fund to cover the actual cost
of transportation.
Summerville School District, also headed by Shampain, has an additional
$70,000 transportation bill for 52 students. Neither district charged
students for bus transportation this year.
With the possibility that the funding could disappear entirely,
school officials have begun discussing ways to fund buses by
consolidating services.
“What the board needs to decide, and we have a few options, is
whether or not we’re going to continue to transport students, whether
we’ll change the routes,” Shampain said.
He added that eliminating bus transportation would be a drastic measure and create an undue burden on parents.
"It would crowd our parking lot,” Shampain said. “We would have
some attendance problems, more than we have now. That’s why rural
districts transport.”
Sonora Union High School District may also face changes, depending on the legislature’s decision.
“We’ve had some preliminary conversations,” Burr said. “We’re of
course going to analyze the routes, analyze the budgets, and be as
efficient as we can.”
Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified School District, which serves an
overwhelmingly rural population in southern Tuolumne County, does not
charge students for bus transportation. The district’s transportation
budget during the 2011-2012 school year was $468,687, of which the
state provided $133,514.
With the possibility of zero funding for 2012-2013, bus route consolidation is an option on the table.
“We’ll have to wait for more information,” said Sheri Cochran, the district’s Administrative Assistant for Finance.
Merrill said that Calaveras Union School District may consolidate
routes into a hub system, but even that seemingly simple situation may
be more problematic than it sounds for many families.
“The other thing is safety,” said Valley Springs resident Cindy
Brown, who has a student at Calaveras High. “You can’t be dropping
little kindergartners off and having them walk home. Or, for that
matter, high school girls.”
In the worst-case scenario — the district could find no way to fund
bus transportation — it may cut other programs, according to Calaveras
Union School District Superintendent Mark Campbell.
“We would have to deplete our reserves as far down as we can, which we’re looking at doing at anyway,” Campbell said.
He said the only other place the district can look to cut $1.3 million from its budget would be from programs for kids.
“We’ve cut our staff as much as we can,” he said. “Now we’re
talking music programs and sports programs that directly impact kids,
which we’ve protected so far.”
Campbell suggested that parents contact their state representatives and voice their concerns.
Proponents of SB81 say it would restore funds for transportation by
cutting per-pupil funding by around $40 a student. According to H.D.
Palmer, spokesman for the California Department of Finance, Brown
expressed his support of SB81 in the Assembly before the vote today.
|